 |
THE
POLISH CORNER: NIGHT OF THE COMETOID!
by Ken Bialobrzeski
- 03.25.04 |

 |
With all the water cooler talk at
work this week centering on the Hollywood blockbuster Dawn
of the Dead, it really got me thinking about asteroids
and meteors and comets and moons… again. The reason
being? Although the movie never mentions the cause of the
wide-spread zombification, I imagine it has to do with the
effects of a passing meteorite, becasue that is the root
cause of most evil things, scientifically speaking. To fully
understand the basis for this theory many factors must be
calculated. As such, I have compiled a timeline, because
as a scientist a timeline is essential. |
I think my interest in and subsequent fear of astronomical phenomenon
began when I was 8. During the opening sequence of one of my favorite
cartoons, Thundarr the Barbarian, a comet was depicted passing
between the earth and its closest moon, the Moon. In doing so, the Moon
was cracked in half and the Ozone layer was dragged away by the comet’s
gravity. Of course, this lead to harmful radiation and crazy gravity which
brought about a time of wizards, warlords, wookie-like creatures called
Ooklas, and other assorted characters that looked like things I later
saw on the show Xena. Of course, Thundarr was not real, but it's
astro physics was dead on. It is the basis for my theory that during the
times of ancient Greece (most accurately depicted in Xena) both
the ozone layer and the Moon were recovering from a similar catastrophy
depicted in the cartoon.
My mother tried to assure me for years that comets held no malice towards
men. I was almost swayed. That is, until I saw the movie, Maximum
Overdrive, which renewed my fear of comets and introduced a new fear
of Emilio Estevez. The plot of this movie is that a much slower, much
more charismatic comet than the comet from Thundarr commands
all the machines of earth to rise up against their human oppressors. As
a little leaguer at the time I was horrified by the scene in which a little
league team was decimated by a soda machine that could launch its cans
with deadly accuracy and velocity from hundreds of feet. To this day,
I am unable to watch an Emilio Estevez film, unless it also has Charlie
Sheen. I really like Charlie Sheen. I’ll watch anything with him
in it, unless it also has Jon Cryer.
This time my father tried to convince me that a soda machine
doesn’t have the mechanical inner workings and mechanisms
to unleash such an assault. But he was a soda sale rep and distributor,
not a soda machine mechanic, and I’m just supposed to take
his word for it?!
Several years later, I smuggled a juice box into the local mega-plex
to see Armageddon. The driving concept is there not only
is an actual “best driller in the world” but when
all the “drilling experts” are asked who the best
driller in the world is, they unanimously agree it’s Bruce
Willis. Also, the best drillers are often misfits, the kind of
drillers other drillers are afraid to drill with because they’re
dangerous “mavericks”. Anyway, if this rock hits the
earth it’s going to infect the world with Space Dementia,
and quite possibly, although not mentioned specifically, Space
Herpes. As if the world didn’t have enough diseases of its
own?
Released at roughly the same time as Armageddon, was
Deep Impact. I never saw Deep Impact because
I thought it was a porn I had already watched several times. Once
I learned it was actually a different film, I figured what’s
the point of seeing it? I figure there’s going to be drilling,
and Robert Duvall is no Bruce Willis. Remember, it was unanimous.
This brings us to today and the release of Dawn of the Dead.
Again, although not positive of the plot, I have seen many zombie movies
and most of them have melded together in my mind. One thing I recall from
at least one of these movies is that a mysterious comet turns people into
zombies either via cosmic radiation or cosmic microorganisms. Rest assured;
it’s cosmic. As you can see, the earth is in constant danger from
astronomical assaults and the varied dooms they can bring. The point to
all this is... curse you Haley! I curse the day you first unleashed your
comet upon us! Sure, your comet may only come about every 76 years, but
the last time it was here, in the mid 80’s, was the height of the
Brat Pack, and more importantly, the height of Emilio Estevez!
|
 |
50 FIRST DATES...
WITH BOREDOM!
by Nathan Fuller
- 02.28.04 |

After watching the trailer for 50 First Dates
which includes a scene where Adam Sandler pretends to be beaten
up by Rob Schneider so he can be “rescued” by Drew Barrymore,
only to have Barrymore retaliate and repeatedly strike Schneider’s
head with a bat, I had a strange feeling. Then I remembered
the scene in Mr. Deeds where Winona Ryder pretends to be
mugged by a friend so she could be “rescued” by Adam Sandler,
who unwittingly beats up the friend by kicking his head in.
Then I recognized that strange feelings as “taking a several hits
to my own head from the dumb stick”. Why would I
pay to see this? Let’s just say I didn’t. Let’s just
say if the movie had made me laugh really hard and if I happened
to be drinking milk at the time, I would have ruined my keyboard.
Adam Sandler plays Henry Roth, a zoo veterinarian living in Hawaii.
This was the first thing that bothered me, because it always
bothers me when Adam Sandler plays someone who isn’t named Adam
Sandler. I mean really, what’s the point? Drew Barrymore
plays Lucy, who has short term memory loss and is constantly reliving
the same day over and over. While her on screen relationship
with Sandler is not nearly as toxic as the one she shares with
Cameron Diaz and Lucy Liu, it’s not nearly as charming as the
chemistry between Sandler and the pet penguin.
There are many things that are hard to explain about this movie.
Why does Lucy’s family go to such elaborate lengths to fool her
into thinking nothing is wrong? Why does “Henry” come up
with a crazy new scheme every day to get her to fall in love with
him instead of sticking with one that works? I estimated
26 at most, where did the number 50 come from? Was a lame,
gay stereotype on ‘roids the best role Sean Austin could land
with all his Samwise Gamgee heat? He’s killing my portfolio
on the Hollywood Stock Exchange.
Some have called 50 First Dates a cross between Groundhog
Day and Memento. I like to think of it more as
a cross between Ace Ventura: Pet Detective and Dare
to Love, the Lifetime TV movie about the toll a young woman’s
schizophrenia takes on her lover - thus proving the old adage
that two wrongs make a worse. On a scale of things that
happen on actual first dates, where throwing up after dinner is
a 1 and sex is a 10, I rate 50 First Dates as being taped
for an appearance on The 5th Wheel and then
being voted as the fifth wheel, the numerical equivalent
of a 3.
|
 |
UNDEAD:
IT'S A LIVE ONE
by Nathan Fuller
- 02.24.04 |

I believe some of the best movie
ideas probably happen in college dorms when someone is watching
something like Forrest Gump and then somebody else who
is completely stoned walks by and says something like, “I’ve seen
this but it would have been so much better if Forrest Gump traveled
into the future, too, and met the Time Bandits.” This would
likely be followed by an explanation to the passerby that Forrest
never “traveled back in time” in the current film- it was about
his life as he lived it, told in a flashback, so time travel of
any kind would make no sense. The explanation misses the
point. The beauty is that if this person ever had the chance
to actually make his own movie, he would call it Forrest Meets
the Time Bandits and it would make a million dollars.
This is because in today’s market even the worst theatrical releases
make a million dollars. But it’s also because he had the
guts to call it what it is. Hollywood is busy ripping off
and combining old movies, then trying to fool us into thinking
we’re watching something new. Somehow, this fooling process
just makes them all terrible. For example, I don’t know
much about the upcoming Alien Vs. Predator movie, but I
do know it would be better if they just remade Aliens,
gave the Bill Paxton role to Jack Black, and half way through
the movie threw some Predators into the middle of the shit storm
for no apparent reason.
When it comes to zombie movies, filmmakers are
virtually forced into cribbing from previous zombie movies.
Unlike comedies or dramas, where there is a lot of wiggle room
when it comes to plot, a zombie movie pretty much has to have
an army of undead walking the earth. Whether it’s because
of radiation from a passing asteroid or an unleashed virus from
some lab monkeys, it’s still an army of undead walking the earth.
This is one reason why most zombie movies are good – they can’t
try and pretend something they’re not.
 |
The concept of a new zombie
flick from down under sounds a little like something dreamt
up during one of those aforementioned dorm encounters, combining
Night of the Living Dead with the Kiwi sensibility
(and aliens) of Bad Taste, plus a farmer who has
some John Woo guns. If you’re thinking that sounds
like the greatest movie ever made, you’re wrong. But
it’s still very good. And for those who like their
walking dead with a dash of laughs and a heroine who progressively
peels off more and more of her clothes because the acid
rain keeps eating through them, then Undead is the
perfect goulash of ghouls and gags. |
The movie is unavailable on American shores at
this point, but rumors of a global release continue to spread.
While I cannot recommend anyone fly to Australia just to rent
the DVD, I can still rate it positively. On a scale
of movies with regards to how much better they would have been
with the inclusion of Forrest Gump, where One Flew Over The
Cuckoo’s Nest is a 1 (pretty much the same movie) and Jaws
2 is a 10 (‘I think we need a bigger boat… named Jenny,’
Hanks would recite in his Oscar acceptance speech), I give Undead
the rating of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, the numerical
equivalent of a strange and exhilarating 8. |
 |
PAMCHENKO v. LINDY
by Nathan Fuller
- 02.20.04 |

During a typical day, I have plenty of mental
idle time – mostly when I’m waking up, driving to
work, working, driving home from work, watching TV, and falling
asleep. For the bulk of this time, I like to have brain tournaments
to deduce what is the best of its kind. Diet Vanilla Pepsi, for
example, was the winner in the diet soda contest I held during
a meeting with my boss last week. Other bouts have included favorite
colors, fast food chains, dating-themed reality TV shows, and
grunge supergroups. Incidentally, the latter category is also
a deciding factor in sizing up a potential girlfriend, as it is
important she has an opinion on the subject, no matter what it
is. “I like Mad Season,” is just as legitimate as
“I prefer Temple of the Dog’s high-minded meditations
on loss… and guitar feedback!”. But if she gives me
a funny look when I ask her about the matter, then intercourse
is probably as far as the relationship will go. And even then,
I’ll be inserting “Hunger Strike” on the foreplay
tape just for spite.
Yesterday, I came upon a dilemma that could not be solved in
my head. It would require notes and charts and the issue was this:
What is the best sports maneuver in film history, the Pamchenko
Twist or the Triple Lindy? The Twist is from The Cutting Edge,
an ice skating drama starring D.B. Sweeney and Moira Kelly as
two polar opposites paired together on the rink for one final
chance at personal redemption and Olympic gold. The Lindy is a
platform dive featured in Back to School, which stars
Rodney Dangerfield as a senior citizen who returns to college
for hi-jinks.
 |
In comparing the two, I had to look at several
categories, the first of which was believability. The Pamchenko
Twist is a pairs ice skating trick in which the male grabs
his partner by the ankles, swings her around like he’s
performing the hammer throw, and tosses her into the air with
sufficient vertical force as to provide enough time for him
to skate under and catch her. It sounds like a definite loser
until you consider the Triple Lindy is an old man doing flips
from diving board to diving board in slow motion. However,
I had to consider the context of each. The Cutting Edge
purports to be based in reality, so the Twist becomes slightly
|
less believable, while Back to School seems to be more
of a fantasy, so the Lindy suddenly becomes more plausible.I also
had to consider that the audience of Back to School will
generally be drunk, rowdy, and likely to believe anything at 2 in
the morning. The audience of The Cutting Edge, however,
will be hung-over and annoyed that they are watching it for tenth
time on the TBS Saturday Morning Supermovie. The edge in believability:
Triple Lindy.
| Next, I had to balance the emotional impact.
The Pamchenko serves as a climax not only to the quest for
Olympic greatness, but as a poignant climax between the two
protagonists, who have just declared their love for each other
after an hour and a half of sexually charged arguments about
what music they’ll perform their ice dancing routine
to (she wants classical, he wants rock ‘n’ roll!).
The Lindy, on the other hand, is really just a funny way to
end the movie, as the film’s true core involving the
sub-textual love between a crazy millionaire and his street-wise
limo driver has already been resolved by this point. Yet,
the dive does win the |
|
swimming match for the school because one of the other divers chickened
out at the last second. Who is this cowardly diver? None other than
actor William Zabka, who was also the villain in The Karate
Kid done in by Daniel Larusso’s crane kick, which just
happens to be the third best sports maneuver in cinematic history.
So the pleasure of seeing Zabka shamed again adds exponentially
to the gravity of the Triple Lindy. The edge in emotional impact:
Triple Lindy.
It was around this time in my analysis with so many areas left
to cover that I began to grow tired of the exercise. It all seemed
so… pointless, almost as if I was some media slave completely
wasting my life with this shit. It just so happened it was then
I saw that commercial again on television for a company that sells
mail order replicas of the swords from shows like Xena
and Highlander. I realized I needed to be thinking about
more important things. Like what’s the best late night ad
on channel E! ever, this new sword-themed one or Girls
Gone Wild: Spring Break 6?
|
 |
ALL
HOBBITS LOOK ALIKE TO ME
by Robert Jenks
- 02.20.04 |

| The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
would have been better without so many gay hobbits laughing and
dancing around on a bed in slow motion. I mean, isn’t it supposed
to be a fantasy, and not like real life, especially my
real life? Or, it would have been better if everything was exactly
the same except… During the final battle, when Mary or
Pippin or whoever said “It’s the Eagles!” instead
of giant eagles swooping in to attack, fuckin' Donovan McNabb
and the boys rolled up on horseback and McNabb threw a tight ass
spiral through an orc’s head, and goes, “It eats like
a meal!” Then all his boys started callin’ blitz packages
and the orcs don’t know what to do because they’ve
never played football. Or…
If the Orc General that looked like a cross between the Toxic
Avenger and Sloth (from Goonies), had a fat little colonel
sidekick named Chunk and the soldiers of Gundor wouldn’t
open the gates unless he did the Truffle Shuffle. Or…
During what I believe was the third ending, when everyone was
getting on the boat, Yoda and Obi Won and Anakin were bringing
up the rear. Or…
There was a scene where a muppet jams a small crystal into a
larger crystal in a very sexual manner.
|
 |
MY
MONKEY OF THE WEEK: THE SUPERBOWL MONKEYS
by Kevin Shaughnessy
- 02.19.04 |

| My name is Kevin Shaughnessy and I love monkeys.
During the Superbowl this year, there was a commercial featuring
a man that had a “monkey on his back” because
he was having so much trouble finding a “hip family
sedan”. In this case, there literally was a monkey on
his back, which I’m assuming was supposed to be the
funny part. When he finds his car, the monkey stays at the
car dealership with a bunch of other monkeys presumably left
by other men who were facing the same sedan predicament. |
|
Linguists will tell you the phrase “monkey on his back”
originated in the early 1600’s after Shakespeare saw a picture
of a Pygmy Marmoset perched on the back of a Papua New Guinea
tribesman. Of course, this particular species is a very hostile
primate when living in packs. So in reality, the salesmen at the
dealership in this advertisement would have been attacked almost
immediately by these monkeys using what one anthropologist has
called “the Pygmy’s fearsome claw seemingly designed
for eye-gouging.” Also, all the cars would be smeared with
feces. My name is Kevin Shaughnessy and I love monkeys. |
 |
HE'S HAVING A
BABY
by Nathan Fuller
- 02.19.04 |

One of my college roommates is having a baby.
Every time this happens, I am forced to reflect on how unprepared
I am to start saving for a big screen TV, much less even consider
the possibility of fatherhood. I’m 27, but most of the time
I feel like I’m in high school and confused about life.
Or junior high and girls, respectively. Or elementary school and
body hair. Or college and my sexuality. The other times I feel
like I’m 75 and very bitter about how I never even owned
a television set larger than 32 inches. I suppose this would be
OK if I didn’t harbor similar doubts about my old friends
and their ability to deal with children.
 |
When my last college roommate had her baby,
I was afraid all the years of “slutting for homework”
may have paid off with a fast graduation but left her unqualified
to treat a newborn properly. Sure enough, she sent me this
picture of him pimping for this website almost immediately.
So now he’s on the same site that often features words
like “fuck”, “diarrhea”, “vomit”,
and “polish”. I wasn’t too worried, though,
because her husband is a real adult and has things like maturity
and emotional fortitude – things I imagine come in handy
when dealing with kids. Of course, aside from the picture
(which I appreciate) |
she has proven to be an excellent parent. So much so that I can
now call her a mother, finally not bracketed by “beer crazy”
and “fucker”.
But now another one is having a baby. You may know him as the
guy who writes the “My Monkey of the Week” segments
here. I know him as the guy who complains to me about using his
name to write about monkeys in a way that will apparently get
him fired someday. I love him dearly, but am seriously afraid
in 9 months he’ll have prioritized “buy diapers”
and “help son develop motor skills” way below “keep
searching for a baby bib that says ‘Han Shot First’”.
And does he know it will be at least a few years before he can
start teaching this kid about military stealth and tactical maneuvers
using X-Box Live? And even then, will he even be able to convince
his wife the art of Tom Clancy sneak attacks are more important
than spelling?
Perhaps I am just upset that he doesn’t own any pornography,
hence denying all his friends the traditional “Porn Bequeathment
Party”, wherein a soon-to-be father jettisons his collection
because of the guilt generated by a baby within 50-feet of Rocco’s
Anal Adventures - something that still could have been enjoyed
on my crappy TV. Yet, with regard to the prospects of successful
parenting, I will grudgingly admit it is probably better he never
had any in the first place.
In the end, I’m sure he will rise to the occasion the same
way all the other people did who at one point in their lives have
fallen asleep with their head in my toilet. It should be noted,
most of the ones who did this after final exams, not the ones
who did it the night before, are the ones having kids. And for
that, society can be thankful. |
 |
TALKING POINT
BLUES
by Nathan Fuller
- 02.18.04 |

| The latest catch phrase in political spin seems to
be “negative advertising”, this year's “political
hate speech”, next week's "activist judges", all
totally meaningless. Both Ed Gillespie and Terry Holt have lamented
the “millions” of dollars spent on negative ads in explaining
polls that have any democrat beating Bush by over 10 percent in
November. Gillespie predicts the “the dirtiest campaign in
modern presidential politics” from the left-wingers.
Of course, the Bush campaign was responsible for one of the ugliest
campaigns in recent history against John McCain in South Carolina
during the 2000 primaries. Though in retrospect, maybe push polling
McCain as a “liar, cheat, fraud” and a “pro-abortion…
fag candidate” was not so much negative as it was spiritually
disapproving. Now, John Kerry and John Edwards are getting in
on the intra-party shit slinging. With the field narrowed to two,
Edwards has begun to point out the difference between himself
and northern senator, which prompted Kerry’s manager to
quickly declare “it’s funny how fast he turned negative”.
The irony is that a lot of recent “negative advertising”
is just “true advertising” and the only way some see
to defend it is to marginalize and discredit it with disingenuous
language. “Negative” and “bad” may be
synonyms, but negative campaigning is not necessarily a bad thing,
not as long as it’s accurate. If I can’t have that,
then at least give me something I like to call “push positive”
commercials:
| “If I’m elected I promise not to start
unnecessary wars, bleed the environment dry, and leave children
behind in our educational system while confusing the elderly
voting block with doublespeak”. |
You see how it only accentuates the positive of the contender
speaking? Plus, just about anything is perfectly legitimate:
| “As president, I would never cover up anything
in my past, up to and including going AWOL from guard duty
in ‘Bama because I killed someone while I was drunk
driving in Nantucket.” |
All of this would most certainly be true (and positive) for any
Democratic candidate. |
 |
THE
SELECTIVE SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITOR DIARIES, VOL. 2
by Nathan Fuller
- 02.02.04 |

 |
It has been a while since my last diary and
that’s because I stopped taking my medication. Many
people will equate the phrase “stopped taking my medication”
with paranoid schizophrenia and the self-infliction of scissor
cuts, but in my case, it only meant getting a DVD pass from
Blockbuster and watching 60 movies in 30 days. You’d
think this would provide an abundance of material to write
reviews with, but I can do that very quickly right now- On
a scale of popcorn toppings, where pepper is a 1 and sugar
frosting is a 10, I give most of the movies I saw the rating
of something I found in my kitchen cabinet called Instant
Bouillon Chicken Granules, the numerical equivalent of a 2.
As for the rest, Freddy Vs. Jason and Seabiscuit,
I give them the rating of pepper. |
When I last wrote, I was about to start Paxil. I don’t
think it did anything but my girlfriend said she heard “it
makes you hate people”. Since I already hated people, I
couldn’t tell a difference, but it did pique my curiosity
about the unqualified opinions and shared myths of lay persons
about medicine. So I did an internet search for the side-effects.
I found one site, www.prozactruth.com,
asserting that all psych drugs can result in horrible nightmares,
nipple discharging, joint pain, profuse sweating, and best of
all, depression. I laughed, I mean really laughed, for
the first time in months.
So, I went back to my doctor for something else. He offered me
a list of new antidepressants to choose from but provided no real
information as to the difference between them. Put in this type
of position, making a completely blind selection, I do what I
usually do – pick whatever sounds most like a character
from the He-Man: Masters of the Universe cartoon. I took
home a prescription for Effexor with new hope.
I’ve tried this only five times, but each time has resulted
in thirty minutes of calm, followed by an hour of crippling nausea,
and then 3 hours of clement nausea. I don’t know the molecular
apparatus by which Effexor works, but if it’s supposed to
make you forget about the farce of human existence by inducing
diarrhea, then it really works!
 |
I am thinking about giving up on the anti-depressants
all together, but then I look at my feet, and I am always
wearing at least one of the pairs of socks you can see in
these pictures. Yet, it is never Christmas or Easter or even
gay pride day, so something must be wrong. |
 |
|
 |
THE TECHNOLOGY
REPORT
by Robert Jenks
- 02.02.04 |

| I don’t really know anything about computers.
However, I recently was given a computer for Christmas (technically,
it was given to my girlfriend, but I’m terribly demanding).
Not really knowing how to take advantage of this new technological
tool to gain access to all the porn, I figured the first step
would be to invest in a little high speed internet, a T-1 line
to be specific. Again, I don’t know what that means, but
everyone seems somewhat impressed and very much shocked when I
tell them. They never believe me either until I explain that it’s
shared by entire apartment complex. But that’s not the point.
The point is that there are an awful lot of websites out there.
For instance, when I typed in the keywords “ninja”
and “pirate” after a friend of mine told me about
a website that featured stories written by an 8 year-old in which
pirates did battle with “fucking crazy” ninjas, I
came across over 3,000 sites. That seems to me to be an awful
lot of sites that deal with both ninjas and pirates. Desperate
to read the stories, however, I systematically began searching
through every web page. Unfortunately, I was able to only get
3 sites into my journey when I happened upon a site that foretold
of impending doom.
I was disturbed to find out that February 3rd, 2004, is Ninja
vs. Pirate day, and we must all align ourselves to our preferred
particular side in a global fight to the death. That’s not
a lot of warning. Maybe this has been posted for a while, but
what about those of us who just recently obtained internet access?
Or more importantly, what about those out there who have yet to
do the “pirate ninja” internet search? It seems as
though thousands of poor bastards will invariably be caught in
the deadly crossfire between throwing stars and cannonballs. My
advice to those that read this is to quickly choose a side. Though
you may be swayed by the argument made on several message boards
that “there is no way a ninja is going to sneak up on a
pirate in a creaky wooden ship while it's in the ocean”,
just remember that many ninjas can teleport, and also keep in
mind that many people think a wildcard third party, robots, will
somehow factor in the ultimate decision. Good luck... unless you
are a Ninja sympathizer, then may God grant you a quick musketoon
death when you come face to face with Jolly Bob the Pillager (that’s
me).
|
 |
THE
POLISH CORNER: HOLIDAY SCIENCE
by Ken Bialobrzeski
- 01.01.04 |

| It’s the new year and the holidays are
upon us. I feel it’s my duty as an underground internet
science reporter to separate the religious “jibba-jabba”
from the factual basis for these seasonal observations.
Of the three major holidays, Kwanza is the one I know the least
about and therefore, will be the easiest to debunk. Quite frankly,
the word sounds made up. Sure, it’s fun to say, Kwanza,
but so is “tallywacker”. Also, my wife Wendy (whose
last name shall remain unmentioned for anonymities sake) laughs
whenever I say “tallywacker” until I begin to jokingly
slap her in the face with a thawed polish sausage. She eventually
makes me go sleep on the couch, even though I say “But it’s
Kwanza!” to try and cheer her up again. I’m just saying,
any holiday that ruins foreplay and then makes you sleep on the
couch as part of its celebration can’t be all that fucking
great!
.
If I know the least about Kwanza, then I know the most least about
Christmas, the so-called “Hollywood Holiday of the Stars.”
The main theme of Christmas involves placing offerings in front
of a pine tree in hopes that it will grant you prosperity in the
upcoming year. And although I enjoy celebrating nature, there’s
one thing I enjoy celebrating more. And that is fucking science!
When I think of major holidays and science, I think about Hanukah,
and then I think about spelling and then I think about the 5th
grade spelling bee and then I get sad and then I need cheering
up, so I think about Hanukah again, the perfect marriage of religion
and science. It’s a holiday that is based on candles, which
of course means fire, man’s first and most significant scientific
discovery. Now that’s a holiday I can fucking dig on! And
don’t even get me started on the physics of the centripetal
force required to keep that crazy top spinning. Seriously, I’m
not in the mood!
And of course, there is the most greatest of all winter holidays,
Festivus. Festivus is a holiday which I learned about on the Jerry
Seinfeld Show and it involves placing an aluminum pole in the
corner. Pole! Corner! Polish Corner! An interesting side note,
by the way- when I played high school baseball, my teammates referred
to me as “The Aluminum Pole” despite my wishes for
them to call me “The Tallywacker.”
So until I can get time off work for Festivus, or the Pope invents
a Christmas that involves lighting a spinning tree on fire, I’ll
continue celebrating in the same fashion that I have since I was
a boy, by adorning my Christmas costume and going from door to
door offering to grant my neighbors three wishes if I can rub
their magic lamp and if they give me candy. This year I’m
going as a pirate… a science pirate! Arrgh!
|
|
|















|